The new Sony Alpha 300 series of DSLRs have been making
their rounds on review sites. David Pogue reviewed the
A300 for the New York Times, and
CNET and
Digital Trends have reviews of the
A350.
Imaging Resource has a very
detailed review of the 350.
Let me tell you why I'm a big fan of the Alpha 300 in
particular. The differences between the 300 and 350
aren't huge, and if you've been reading any photography
blogs in the past little while, you'll know that at
some point, more megapixels result in diminishing
returns, particularly in the areas of noise and write
speeds.
Honestly speaking, the Alphas don't have the best
picture quality or lens selection out there. Canon
seems to rule the roost on picture quality, and Nikon
seems to dominate with optics. Having said that, the
Alpha are no slouches. Unless you're a hardcore
photography buff (and therefore not the target of this
article), you're likely to be more than happy with the
pictures that come out of an Alpha.
The key, however, is to remember that the most
important part of photography is the
photographer's
eye. Let me give you a good example: at my
wedding, there must have been a dozen relatives with
more cutting edge and expensive gear than the guy we
hired to take pictures. When I look at the pictures I
got from my wedding - there were many photos from
relatives that may have been superior in clarity and
colour, but none that were superior in composition or
craft. Clearly it takes more than a great camera to
take a great picture. Combine a great eye with great
gear, and then you've got
Daily Dose of Imagery.
The second most important part of photography is how
easy the camera is to use. Sony's Live View is
currently the best implementation on a digital SLR.
At this moment, Live View is enough of a reason to
consider the Alpha 300 series over its
competitors. You can take pictures from low and
high angles more easily than any other DSLR. By using a
second sensor, there are no mirror tricks, and you get
the same ease of use that you would from a standard
digital point and shoot. The speed of the camera is
pretty peppy, so all in all, it's a usable camera.
The Alpha 300 is a great camera for average Joes who
are looking for a little more than a point-and-shoot or
super zoom camera. It's affordable (for a DSLR, at
least), at around $800 CDN with a zoom lens. Note that
the Alpha 300's big brother, the Alpha 350 goes for the
same price without a kit lens. At 10MP, the Alpha 300's
picture quality is more than enough for most weekend
shooters, and it's super easy to use. Add a
Lensbaby 3G, and you'll be taking
spectacular pictures in no time.
Just a little postscript to this recommendation: When
it comes to lenses, I'm not a big fan of zoom lenses,
but I'm a lesser fan of lens swapping. I tend to think
that for most hobbyist photographers, these are the
lenses that should be bought:
- Wide to Moderate Zoom, i.e. 20mm - 70mm
- Short depth of field lens, like a Lensbaby
- If you find yourself taking a lot of group shots,
get a good quality wide angle lens as well
Note that I'm not a fan of telephoto lenses.
They're expensive, heavy, and harder to use. Telephoto
lenses are better for people who really know what
they're doing. Sad to say, but a lot of people who have
telephoto lenses don't know what they're doing.
Tags: sony, alpha 300, alpha 350, lensbaby